Guglielmo v. Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners et al

Filing 219

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6/5/19. (ep)

Case: 3:17-cv-00006-TMR Doc #: 219 Filed: 06/05/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 6073

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
JOSEPH GUGLIELMO,

:

Plaintiff,

:
:

vs

Case No. 3:17-CV-6
District Judge Thomas M. Rose

:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO and
THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD
OF COMMISSIONERS, et al.,
:
Defendants.

:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED
that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may,
upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not
consummated.
Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated within
the sixty (60) day period. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the
settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673
(1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will
retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas M. Rose
Date: June 5, 2019
Thomas M. Rose, Judge
United States District Court