Guglielmo v. Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners et al

Filing 219

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6/5/19. (ep)

Download PDF
Case: 3:17-cv-00006-TMR Doc #: 219 Filed: 06/05/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 6073 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JOSEPH GUGLIELMO, : Plaintiff, : : vs Case No. 3:17-CV-6 District Judge Thomas M. Rose : MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO and THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, et al., : Defendants. : ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated within the sixty (60) day period. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas M. Rose Date: June 5, 2019 Thomas M. Rose, Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?