Howard v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

Filing 38

RECOMMITTAL ORDER - The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter i s hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-14-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
EVERETTE E. HOWARD,
Petitioner,

:

- vs -

Case No. 3:17-cv-15
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

WARDEN, London Correctional
Institution
:
Respondent.

RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This case is before the Court on Petitioner=s Objections (ECF No. 36) to the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 35).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be
more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly,

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with
instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations
based on that analysis.

December 14, 2017

*s/Thomas M. Rose
_____________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge

1