Vaduva v. City of Xenia, Ohioet al
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY DEADLINES (DOC. 30 )- Having considered the joint motion by Plaintiff Virgil Vaduva and DefendantCity of Xenia to Extend the Discovery Deadlines and the cut-off date for filing summary judgmen t motions, the Court finds the motion well taken. The Court hereby orders the following changes in the Preliminary Pretrial Scheduling Order: 9. December 4, 2017Cut-off date for making requests for admissionsbe to February 4, 2018; 10. February 1, 20 18 Discovery Cut-off date be extended to March 9, 2018; 11. February 8, 2017 Discovery telephone conference be continued to April 11, 2018; and 12. March, 2018 Cut-off date for filing Summary judgment motions to be extended to May 1, 2018. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1/26/18. (kma)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
F O R T H E SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
VIRGIL J. VADUVA ,
)
Case No. 3:17-cv-41
Plaintiff,
)
Judge Thomas Rose
vs.
)
CITY OF XENIA, OHIO, et al,
)
Defendants.
)
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DISCOVERY DEADLINES (DOC. 30)
Having considered the joint motion by Plaintiff Virgil Vaduva and Defendant
City of Xenia to Extend the Discovery Deadlines and the cut-off date for filing summary
judgment motions, the Court finds the motion well taken. The Court hereby orders the
following changes in the Preliminary Pretrial Scheduling Order:
9.
December 4, 2017—Cut-off date for making requests for admissions
be to February 4, 2018;
10.
February 1, 2018 – Discovery Cut-off date be extended to March 9,
2018;
11.
February 8, 2017 – Discovery telephone conference be continued to
April 11, 2018; and
12.
March, 2018 – Cut-off date for filing Summary judgment motions to
be extended to May 1, 2018.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Friday, January 26, 2018.
s/Thomas M. Rose
________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?