Bundy v. Rush Expediting, Inc. et al
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE -The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-13-2017. (de)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Diana Bundy
Plaintiff,
v.
Rush Expediting, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:17-CV-43
Judge Thomas Rose
ORDER OF DISMISSAL:
TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above
matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED,
with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good
cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.
Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is
consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the
settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114
S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted
judgment entry.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 13, 2017
*s/Thomas M. Rose
____________________________________
Honorable Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?