Bundy v. Rush Expediting, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING CASE -The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-13-2017. (de)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Diana Bundy
Plaintiff,
v.
Rush Expediting, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 3:17-CV-43
Judge Thomas Rose
ORDER OF DISMISSAL:
TERMINATION ENTRY

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above
matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED,
with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good
cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.
Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is
consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the
settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114
S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted
judgment entry.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 13, 2017

*s/Thomas M. Rose
____________________________________
Honorable Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge