Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING 11 Joint Stipulation filed by Commissioner of Social Security - This case shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), for further development of the record. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action to complete the administrative record and issue a new decision. As part of said proceedings, the administrative Law Judge will reweigh the medical opinions and account for all of Plaintiff's limitations in the RFC finding. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-22-2017. (de)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
DENISE ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:17-cv-00052
Judge Thomas M. Rose
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO REMAND TO COMMISSIONER
(DOC. 11)
This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation and Motion to
Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 11). Due notice having been given, and the Court
being fully advised, it is hereby ordered that:
This case shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative
proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g), for further development of the record. On remand, the Administrative Law
Judge will offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action to complete the
administrative record and issue a new decision. As part of said proceedings, the
Administrative Law Judge will reweigh the medical opinions and account for all of
Plaintiff’s limitations in the RFC finding.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Tuesday, August 22, 2017.
s/Thomas M. Rose
________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?