Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING 11 Joint Stipulation filed by Commissioner of Social Security - This case shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), for further development of the record. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action to complete the administrative record and issue a new decision. As part of said proceedings, the administrative Law Judge will reweigh the medical opinions and account for all of Plaintiff's limitations in the RFC finding. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-22-2017. (de)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION DENISE ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:17-cv-00052 Judge Thomas M. Rose ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO REMAND TO COMMISSIONER (DOC. 11) This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation and Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 11). Due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, it is hereby ordered that: This case shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further development of the record. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action to complete the administrative record and issue a new decision. As part of said proceedings, the Administrative Law Judge will reweigh the medical opinions and account for all of Plaintiff’s limitations in the RFC finding. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Tuesday, August 22, 2017. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?