Brown v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution

Filing 39

RECOMMITTAL ORDER - re 38 Objection to Report and Recommendations filed by Jeffrey Antonio Brown - The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge withinstructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-27-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
JEFFREY ANTONIO BROWN,
Petitioner,

:

- vs -

Case No. 3:17-cv-080
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

SHEA HARRIS, Warden,
Warren Correctional Institution,
:
Respondent.

RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court on Petitioner’s
Objections (ECF No. 38) to the Magistrate Judge’s Second Supplemental Report and
Recommendations (ECF No. 34).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be
more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with
instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations
based on that analysis.
March 27, 2018

*/Thomas M. Rose
_____________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge

1