Brown v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution

Filing 64

RECOMMITTAL ORDER - re 63 Objection to Magistrate Judge Order filed by Jeffrey Antonio Brown El. This habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections 63 to the Magistrate Judge's Order to Amend the Caption 56 . The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. This matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge wit h instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5-21-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JEFFREY ANTONIO BROWN EL, Petitioner, : - vs - Case No. 3:17-cv-080 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz SHEA HARRIS, Warden, Warren Correctional Institution, : Respondent. RECOMMITTAL ORDER This habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court on Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 63) to the Magistrate Judge’s Order to Amend the Caption (ECF No. 56). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis. May 21, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose _____________________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?