Newman v. University of Dayton et al

Filing 35

ENTRY AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-4-2017. (de)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON PETER NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:17-cv-179 Judge Thomas M. Rose ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH (DOC. 24) This case is before the Court on the Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (“Motion to Quash”) (Doc. 24) filed by Non-Party the Office of Bar Admissions of the Supreme Court of Ohio (“Office of Bar Admissions”). On September 26, 2017, Plaintiff Peter Newman filed a Memorandum in Opposition (Doc. 31), in which he stated that he was withdrawing the subpoena at issue and therefore the Motion to Quash should be denied as moot. The next day, the Office of Bar Admissions notified the Court that Plaintiff had in fact withdrawn his subpoena. (Doc. 32.) Based on these representations, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Quash (Doc. 24) as moot. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Wednesday, October 4, 2017. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?