Newman v. University of Dayton et al
ENTRY AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-4-2017. (de)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, et al.,
Case No. 3:17-cv-179
Judge Thomas M. Rose
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH (DOC. 24)
This case is before the Court on the Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce
Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil
Action (“Motion to Quash”) (Doc. 24) filed by Non-Party the Office of Bar Admissions
of the Supreme Court of Ohio (“Office of Bar Admissions”). On September 26, 2017,
Plaintiff Peter Newman filed a Memorandum in Opposition (Doc. 31), in which he
stated that he was withdrawing the subpoena at issue and therefore the Motion to
Quash should be denied as moot. The next day, the Office of Bar Admissions notified
the Court that Plaintiff had in fact withdrawn his subpoena. (Doc. 32.) Based on these
representations, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Quash (Doc. 24) as moot.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Wednesday, October 4, 2017.
s/Thomas M. Rose
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?