Galluzzo v. State of Ohio, et al. et al

Filing 28

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MERZ 26 , OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS 27 TO MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 26 , DENYING PETITIONER'S SECOND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. 25 ). Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-28-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Michael A. Galluzzo,
Petitioner,
Case No. 3:17-cv-218
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

v.

State of Ohio, et al.,
Respondent.

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MERZ (ECF 26), OVERRULING PETITIONER=S OBJECTIONS (ECF 27)
TO MAGISTRATE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, (ECF 26),
DENYING
PETITIONER’S
SECOND
MOTION
FOR
RECONSIDERATION. (ECF 25).

On March 14, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz filed a Report and
Recommendation, (ECF 26), suggesting that the Court deny Petitioner Michael A. Galluzzo’s
Second Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF 25). On March 23, 2018, Petitioner filed Objection to
the Magistrate=s Report and Recommendations. (ECF 27).
As required by 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has
made a de novo review of the record in this case, taking into consideration both of Petitioner’s
objections. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff=s Objection, (ECF 27), to the
Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations, (ECF 26), is not well taken and is hereby
OVERRULED. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Magistrate Judge=s Report and
Recommendations. (ECF 26). Petitioner’s Second Motion for Reconsideration, (ECF 25), is

hereby DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED this Wednesday, March 28, 2018.

s/Thomas M. Rose
________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2