Dayton v. Purdue Pharma LP et al

Filing 37

ORDER granting #35 Motion -It is ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion of Defendant Allergan Finance LLC to Stay Date by Which to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that the date by which Defendant Allergan Finance LLC f/k/a Actavis, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Allergan Finance) shall answer, move, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby stayed pending a final determination of removal; and it is further ORDERED that Allergan Finance shall have sixty (60) days after the date of the final determination of removal by which to answer, move, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-13-2017. (de)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
CITY OF DAYTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:17cv229
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Michael R. Merz

ORDER

Upon consideration, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion of Defendant Allergan Finance LLC to Stay
Date by Which to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that the date by which Defendant Allergan Finance LLC f/k/a Actavis, Inc.
f/k/a Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Allergan Finance”) shall answer, move, plead, or otherwise
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby stayed pending a final determination of removal; and
it is further
ORDERED that Allergan Finance shall have sixty (60) days after the date of the final
determination of removal by which to answer, move, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s
Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTERED this 13th of October, 2017.

*s/Thomas M. Rose
Thomas M. Rose
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE