Dayton v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
Filing
42
ORDER granting #41 Motion to Stay pending action by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 11-13-2017. (de)
<![CDATA[
Case: 3:17-cv-00229-TMR Doc #: 41-1 Filed: 11/10/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1567
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
CITY OF DAYTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., et al.
Defendants.
Case No. 3:17-cv-00229-TMR
Hon. Thomas M. Rose
ORDER GRANTING
MANUFACTURER DEFENDANTS’
UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION TO
STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING
ACTION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL
ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
For good cause shown, Manufacturer Defendants’ Unopposed Joint Motion to Stay
Proceedings Pending Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED. All
proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending a final decision on the motion to transfer
pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTERED this 13th day of November, 2017
*s/Thomas M. Rose
Thomas M. Rose
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
