Dayton v. Purdue Pharma LP et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting 41 Motion to Stay pending action by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 11-13-2017. (de)

Download PDF
Case: 3:17-cv-00229-TMR Doc #: 41-1 Filed: 11/10/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1567 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CITY OF DAYTON, Plaintiff, v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., et al. Defendants. Case No. 3:17-cv-00229-TMR Hon. Thomas M. Rose ORDER GRANTING MANUFACTURER DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACTION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION For good cause shown, Manufacturer Defendants’ Unopposed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED. All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending a final decision on the motion to transfer pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTERED this 13th day of November, 2017 *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?