Ward v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would beobjectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-25-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DEVINE D. WARD, : Petitioner, Case No. 3:17-cv-301 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz WARDEN, Ross Correctional Institution, Respondent. : ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 4), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), and noting a request for extension of time to file objections was granted in part and no objections were filed thereafter, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. October 25, 2017. *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?