Buck v. Warden Dayton Correctional Institution
Filing 7
ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 - The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United StatesMagistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 6 , to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.It is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSE D with prejudice.Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-1-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
