Casey v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Filing 18

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND TERMINATION ENTRY- Having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, this case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 45 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Courts jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 4/9/18. (kma)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON STEVEN CASEY, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-366 vs. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Consent Case) Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND TERMINATION ENTRY ______________________________________________________________________________ Having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, this case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 45 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 9, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?