Nathan Hake Farms LLC

Filing 5

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL 4 AND TERMINATING CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-12-2018. (de)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON : Case No. 3:18-CV-13 : Judge Thomas M. Rose Debtor/Appellant, : : : v. : NOBLE OPPORTUNITY FUND II, LP, : : Creditor/Appellee. : : ______________________________________________________________________________ NATHAN HAKE FARMS LLC, ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (DOC. 4) AND TERMINATING CASE ______________________________________________________________________________ This bankruptcy appeal is before the Court on Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Doc. 4) filed by Appellee Noble Opportunity Fund, II LP (“Noble Opportunity”). Noble Opportunity moves to dismiss Appellant Nathan Hake Farms LLC’s appeal of the dismissal of its Chapter 12 Proceeding before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Noble Opportunity argues that dismissal is proper because (1) Appellant failed to timely file a Notice of Appeal with the bankruptcy court clerk, (2) Appellant is a limited liability company and the Notice of Appeal was filed by a non-attorney manager, and (3) Appellant has failed to prosecute this appeal. (Doc. 4 at 2-4.) Appellant did not respond to the Motion to Dismiss Appeal and the time for it to do so has expired. This matter is therefore ripe for review. WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated in Noble Opportunity’s supporting memorandum and noting that no opposition has been filed, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Doc. 4) and DISMISSES this case, which shall be terminated on the docket of this Court. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, March 12, 2018. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?