Miller v Commissioner Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DOC. 12 ); (2) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 40S(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/26/2018. (srb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GAIL M. MILLER, Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-14 vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Defendant. ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DOC. 12); (2) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 40S(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET This Social Security disability benefits appeal is presently before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 12. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) the ALJ's non-disability finding is found unsupported by substantial evidence, and the parties' joint request for a remand (doc. 12) is GRANTED; (2) this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and (3) this case is TERMINATED upon the Court's docket. The Clerk is ORDERED to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: !Ay;;;;=' Walter H. Rice United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?