Neff v. Department of Veterans Administration
Filing
29
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Courts jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Americ a, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/11/2020. (srb)
Case: 3:18-cv-00073-WHR-MJN Doc #: 29 Filed: 08/11/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 100
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
CHRISTY NEFF
: CASE NO. 3:18cv73
Plaintiff,
:
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
v.
:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
ADMINISTRATION, et al.
:
:
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been
settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties,
provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if
settlement is not consummated.
Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be
aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate
appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.
The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if
necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
(tp - per Judge Rice authorization)
WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?