Bogie v. Bridgetstone Americas Tire Operations, LLC

Filing 4

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (DOC. 1); (2) DIRECTING RESPONDENTS PROVIDE ALL RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS ON MAY 24, 2018 AT 10:30 A.M. IN COURTROOM FOUR; AND (3) ADVISING RESPONDENTS THAT FAILURE TO APPEA R AND/OR PRODUCE RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 4/30/2018. (dm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
ANN BOGIE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

Case No. 3:18-cv-87

vs.
BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE
OPERATIONS, LLC, et al.,

District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (DOC. 1); (2) DIRECTING RESPONDENTS
PROVIDE ALL RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS ON MAY 24, 2018 AT 10:30 A.M. IN
COURTROOM FOUR; AND (3) ADVISING RESPONDENTS THAT FAILURE TO
APPEAR AND/OR PRODUCE RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS MAY RESULT IN THE
IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
______________________________________________________________________________
This miscellaneous civil case1 is before the Court on the motion of Defendants Bridgestone
Amercias Tire Operations, LLC and Bridgestone Americas, Inc. to compel production of
documents sought by a subpoena they issued to and served upon non-parties Dhaliwal Trucking,
Inc. and Sukhdeep Singh Brar (hereafter collectively referred to as “Respondents”). Doc. 1.
Respondents did not file a memorandum in opposition to Defendants’ motion and the time for
doing so has expired. On April 30, 2018, the undersigned held a hearing in open court on
Defendants’ motion. Attorney Patrick Healy appeared and participated on behalf of Defendants.
Respondents did not appear and counsel did not appear on their behalf.
There being no opposition to Defendants’ motion to compel, Defendants’ motion is hereby
GRANTED. Doc. 1. Respondents Dhaliwal Trucking, Co., Inc. and Sukhdeep Singh Brar are

Although filed as a civil case with a civil case number (“cv”), this case is appropriately a
miscellaneous case (“mc”) and will be treated as such rather than refiled as a mc case.
1

ORDERED to produce all documents responsive to Defendants’ subpoena duces tecum. Such
production shall occur on May 24, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom #4 in the Federal Building,
200 West Second Street, Fifth Floor, Dayton, Ohio 45402. Respondents are ADVISED that
failure to appear and/or to produce all responsive documents in their possession on May 24, 2018
may result in the issuance of sanctions up to and including a finding of contempt and the issuance
of an arrest warrant.
The Clerk is ORDERED to serve this Order on Respondents my regular mail at the
following addresses:
Dhaliwal Trucking Co Inc.
10669 Nestling Drive
Miamisburg, OH 45342

Skhdeep Singh Brar
2512 Falling Water Drive
Dayton, OH 45459

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:

April 30, 2018

s/ Michael J. Newman
Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge

2