Thompson v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution

Filing 59

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND REINSTATING CASE- To the extent Petitioner disclaims any intent to dismiss the Petition, the Court can easily correct the harm. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60, both the Magistrate Judges Decision and Order Granti ng Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 56 ) and the Clekrs Judgment carrying out that Order (ECF No. 57 ) are VACATED. and this case is ordered reinstated on the active docket of this Court. On January 2, 2020, prior to receipt of the spurious Motion to Dis miss, the Magistrate Judge had entered an Analysis of the Current Status of this Case which found the case was not ripe for decision because of the reported pendency of a motion for reconsideration in the Second District Court of Appeals and possible subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio (ECF No. 54 ). The Magistrate Judge has confirmed that a motion for reconsideration is in fact pending before the Second District Court of Appeals as of the date of this Order. Accordingly, the status of the case remains as noted in the Analysis: stayed pending the finality of Petitioners currently pending appeal. The Courts prior Order for Status Reports remains in effect.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 2/25/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON CRAIG A. THOMPSON, Petitioner, : - vs - Case No. 3:18-cv-117 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz CHAE HARRIS, Warden, Warren Correctional Institution : Respondent. ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND REINSTATING CASE This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Strike and Reinstate Habeas Petition (ECF No. 58). On February 5, 2020, the Clerk docketed a Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition 1 which was purportedly signed by Petitioner and served on Respondent on January 27, 2020 (ECF No. 55). Because the dismissal was supposedly voluntary, it was within the decisional authority of the Magistrate Judge under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and was granted (ECF Nos. 56, 57). Petitioner now represents to the Court that he did not sign or cause to be filed the Motion for dismissal. Instead he claims it was fraudulently signed and served by another inmate whom he names and says should be prosecuted. Because this Court has only Petitioner’s identification of the other inmate and no resources with which to investigate that claim, the Court suggests Petitioner should filed a complaint about the fraud with the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and 1 The document bears the case number 3:18-cv-1170 which is not a number ever assigned to a case in this Court. The Clerk docketed it in this case. 1 Corrections. To the extent Petitioner disclaims any intent to dismiss the Petition, the Court can easily correct the harm. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60, both the Magistrate Judge’s Decision and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 56) and the Clekr’s Judgment carrying out that Order (ECF No. 57) are VACATED. and this case is ordered reinstated on the active docket of this Court. On January 2, 2020, prior to receipt of the spurious Motion to Dismiss, the Magistrate Judge had entered an Analysis of the Current Status of this Case which found the case was not ripe for decision because of the reported pendency of a motion for reconsideration in the Second District Court of Appeals and possible subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio (ECF No. 54). The Magistrate Judge has confirmed that a motion for reconsideration is in fact pending before the Second District Court of Appeals as of the date of this Order. 2 Accordingly, the status of the case remains as noted in the Analysis: stayed pending the finality of Petitioner’s currently pending appeal. The Court’s prior Order for Status Reports remains in effect. February 25, 2020. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2 www.clerk.co.montgomery.oh.us, visted February 25, 2020. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?