Bowermaster v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) (DOC. 20 ); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,139.00 IN EAJA FEES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 1/31/2020. (kma)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
JAMMIE BOWERMASTER,
Plaintiff,

Case No.: 3:18-cv-146

vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
(Consent Case)

Defendant.

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF
ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)
(DOC. 20); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,139.00 IN EAJA FEES

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), requesting attorney’s fees in the amount of
$4,139.00. Doc. 20. The Commissioner did not file any opposition to counsel’s motion for fees
and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, the Court deems Plaintiff’s motion as
unopposed. The undersigned has carefully considered Plaintiff’s unopposed motion and the
attachments thereto, and the motion for attorney’s fees is now ripe for decision.
EAJA provides for an award of attorney’s fees to a party who prevails in a civil action
against the United States “when the position taken by the Government is not substantially justified
and no special circumstances exist warranting a denial of fees.” Bryant v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.,
578 F.3d 443, 445 (6th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)). A party who obtains a
Sentence Four remand is a prevailing party for EAJA purposes. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292,
301-02 (1993). EAJA fees are payable to the litigant. Astrue v. Ratliff, 586 U.S. 586, 589 (2010).
Without dispute, Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this case for EAJA purposes and,
therefore, is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under EAJA. See Shalala, 509 U.S. at 301-02.

Having reviewed the time sheet entries submitted by Plaintiff’s counsel and considering the nature
of the work counsel performed in this case, the Court finds both the hourly fee and the time
expended reasonable.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA fees award in the amount of $4,139.00 and,
therefore: (1) Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an EAJA fee award (doc. 20) is GRANTED; (2)
Plaintiff is AWARDED the sum of $4,139.00 in EAJA fees; and (3) as no further matters remain
pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:

January 31, 2020

s/ Michael J. Newman
Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge