Jones et al v. Fleischauer et al

Filing 55

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the pa rties may, upon good cause shown with 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America ,114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgement entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 1/31/2022. (srb)

Download PDF
Case: 3:20-cv-00104-WHR Doc #: 55 Filed: 01/31/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 270 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON AMANDA JONES, et al. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 3:20cv104 JUDGE WALTER B . RICE v. MARK EUGENE FLEISCHAUER, et al. Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court ' s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jmisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?