Sorauf v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties Joint Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 15 ) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiffs favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 11/18/21. (pb)

Case: 3:20-cv-00468-SLO Doc #: 16 Filed: 11/18/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1403

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
JAMES SORAUF,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.

: Case No. 3:20-cv-468
:
: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
: (by full consent of the parties)
:
:
:
:
:
:

DECISION AND ENTRY
This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion
to Remand. (Doc. No. 15). The parties agree that the Commissioner’s decision should be
reversed under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and that this matter should be
remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the
parties’ motion. The parties further agree that judgment should be entered in Plaintiff’s
favor. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative
Law Judge’s decision. The Commissioner will develop the administrative record as
necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social
Security Act and then issue a new decision.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 15) is
ACCEPTED;

Case: 3:20-cv-00468-SLO Doc #: 16 Filed: 11/18/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1404

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s
favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58;

3.

This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security
Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §
405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision
and Entry and the parties’ Motion; and

4.

The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 18, 2021

s/Sharon L. Ovington
Sharon L. Ovington
United States Magistrate Judge

2