Pike Brands LLC v. Eztotz, LLC et al

Filing 19

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of A merica, 114 S.Ct. 1673 ( 1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 1/17/2023. (srb)

Download PDF
Case: 3:21-cv-00181-WHR Doc #: 19 Filed: 01/17/23 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 227 IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON PIKE BRANDS LLC CASE NO. 3:2lcvl81 Plaintiff, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE v. EZTOTZ, LLC Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 ( 1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. WALTER H. RICE, JUDG E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?