Brown v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Filing
39
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5/19/23. (pb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Seneca Brown
Plaintiff,
v.
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:21-cv-199
Judge Thomas M. Rose
ORDER OF DISMISSAL:
TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that this matter has
been settled, and counsel for the parties having provided approval to enter a
conditional dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with
prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause
shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.
Prior to the end of the timeframe to reopen this action, the parties may submit
a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated. Parties intending to
preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of
Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994) and incorporate
appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.
The undersigned also
requires that, if the parties intend to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction, then they
must submit to the Court a copy of the fully-executed settlement agreement (either
by filing it on the docket or emailing it to his chambers).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Thomas M. Rose_________________
Honorable Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?