Knipfer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 8

DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties Joint Motion for Remand (Doc. #7 ) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiffs favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 9/16/22. (pb) Modified on 9/16/2022 (pb).

Download PDF
Case: 3:22-cv-00198-CHG Doc #: 8 Filed: 09/16/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON LISA K., Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : Case No. 3:22-cv-00198 : : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry : (by full consent of the parties) : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This Social Security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Remand. (Doc. 7.) The parties agree that this Court should enter a judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with remand of the cause to the Commissioner. The parties further agree that upon receipt of this Decision and Entry, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision. The Commissioner will develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, hold a new hearing, and then issue a new decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Remand (Doc. 7) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; Case: 3:22-cv-00198-CHG Doc #: 8 Filed: 09/16/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 24 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?