Cummins v. Midmark Corporation
Filing
18
ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 5/10/24. (pb)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
CHRISTOPHER CUMMINS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:23-cv-277
vs.
MIDMARK CORPORATION,
District Judge Michael J. Newman
Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING THIS CASE
______________________________________________________________________________
The Court, having been advised that the parties have settled this matter (Doc. No. 17),
ORDERS that this action is hereby DISMISSED, provided that either party may, upon good cause
shown within forty-five (45) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 10, 2024
s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
