Achs et al v. 3M Company et al

Filing 9

ORDER - This matter comes before the Court upon the Unopposed Motion of Defendants Tyco Fire Products LP and Chemguard, Inc. for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint With Jury Demand (Motion). (Doc. #6 ). For the reasons set forth in the Motion, the Motion (Doc. #6 ) is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all Defendants shall have 28 days from the date of entry of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's decision on whether transfer to the Multidistrict Litigation to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr on 3/27/2024. (srb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
SHAWN ACHS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
3M COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case No. 3:24-cv-93

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr.

ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon the Unopposed Motion of Defendants Tyco Fire
Products LP and Chemguard, Inc. for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint With
Jury Demand (“Motion”). (Doc. #6). For the reasons set forth in the Motion, the Motion (Doc.
#6) is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all Defendants shall have 28 days from the date of
entry of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation’s decision on whether transfer to the
Multidistrict Litigation to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 27, 2024

s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
Peter B. Silvain, Jr.

United States Magistrate Judge