King's Command Foods (2022), LLC. v. Packer's Sanitation Services, Inc., LTD.

Filing 3

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER - This matter is before the Court upon a sua sponte review for compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Plaintiff King's Command Foods (2022), LLC has not filed a diversity disclosure statement as required by that Rule. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. A sample Diversity of Citizenship Disclosure Statement is available on the Courts website. IT IS SO ORDERED. Deficiency Deadline by 6/7/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 5/8/2024. (srb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
KING’S COMMAND FOODS (2022),
LLC,

:
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
vs.
:
PACKER’S SANITATION SERVICES, :
:
INC. LTD,
:
Defendant.

Case No. 3:24-cv-00143
District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon a sua sponte review for compliance with
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Plaintiff King's Command Foods (2022), LLC
has not filed a diversity disclosure statement as required by that Rule. Plaintiff is
therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than thirty days from the date of
this Order. A sample “Diversity of Citizenship Disclosure Statement” is available on the
Court’s website.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Caroline H. Gentry
Caroline H. Gentry
United States Magistrate Judge
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), any party may serve and file specific, written
objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Order. Pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days if this Order is being
1

served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), or (F).
Such objections shall specify the portions of the Order objected to and shall be
accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Order is based
in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting
party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as
all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned
District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections
within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make
objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v.
Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

2