Eickelberger v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (Doc. No. 18 ); (2) AWARDING EAJA FEES TO PLAINTIFF IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $4,850.00; AND (3) MAINTAINING THE TERMINATION OF THIS CASE ON THE COURTS DOCKET. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 3/5/25. (pb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
AUDREY E.,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 3:24-cv-149
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
District Judge Michael J. Newman
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman
Defendant.
___________________________________________________________________________
ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD OF
ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (Doc. No. 18); (2)
AWARDING EAJA FEES TO PLAINTIFF IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $4,850.00; AND
(3) MAINTAINING THE TERMINATION OF THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET
______________________________________________________________________________
This Social Security case is before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulation for an award of
attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount
of $4,850.00. Doc. No. 18. The parties agree that an award of $4,850.00 in attorney fees satisfies
all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and expenses under the EAJA claims in the instant case. Id.
For good cause shown, the Court: (1) GRANTS the parties’ joint stipulation; and (2)
AWARDS EAJA fees in the total amount of $4,850.00. As no further matters remain pending for
review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 5, 2025
s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?