Eickelberger v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (Doc. No. 18 ); (2) AWARDING EAJA FEES TO PLAINTIFF IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $4,850.00; AND (3) MAINTAINING THE TERMINATION OF THIS CASE ON THE COURTS DOCKET. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 3/5/25. (pb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON AUDREY E., Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:24-cv-149 vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (Doc. No. 18); (2) AWARDING EAJA FEES TO PLAINTIFF IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $4,850.00; AND (3) MAINTAINING THE TERMINATION OF THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET ______________________________________________________________________________ This Social Security case is before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulation for an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $4,850.00. Doc. No. 18. The parties agree that an award of $4,850.00 in attorney fees satisfies all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and expenses under the EAJA claims in the instant case. Id. For good cause shown, the Court: (1) GRANTS the parties’ joint stipulation; and (2) AWARDS EAJA fees in the total amount of $4,850.00. As no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 5, 2025 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?