State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Lennox International Inc

Filing 7

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER - This matter is before the Court upon a sua sponte review for compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Defendant Lennox International Inc. has not filed a diversity disclosure statement as requi red by that Rule. Defendant is therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. A sample Diversity of Citizenship Disclosure Statement is available on the Court's website. IT IS SO ORDERED Deficiency Deadline by 7/3/2024.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 6/3/2024. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:24-cv-00163 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon a sua sponte review for compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). Defendant Lennox International Inc. has not filed a diversity disclosure statement as required by that Rule. Defendant is therefore ORDERED to file such a statement no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. A sample “Diversity of Citizenship Disclosure Statement” is available on the Court’s website. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), any party may serve and file specific, written objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days if this Order is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), or (F). 1 Such objections shall specify the portions of the Order objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Order is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?