Lowery et al v. Edmondson et al
Filing 102
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : The defendants motions to dismiss 76 and 78 are GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff Lane and Plaintiff Pierce for their failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and Plaintiffs Lane and Pierce are DISM ISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this action. The defendants motions to dismiss 76 and 78 are GRANTED with respect to all of Plaintiff Lowerys claims, except his claim concerning keeping a fez in his cell and wearing it for religious services. All claims except for Plaintiff Lowerys claim concerning keeping a fez in his cell and wearing it for religious services are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment 93 is DENIED with leave to re-urge on Plaintiff Lowerys remaining claims, in accordance with the courts scheduling order. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
