Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spoon
Filing
34
JUDGMENT by District Judge James H. Payne: entering judgment in favor of Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Co. against Gary Spoon (terminates case) (granting 33 Motion to Enforcement Settlement Agreement) (cjt, Deputy Clerk) Modified text on 9/2/2011 (cjt, Deputy Clerk).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
INDIANA LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL
INSURANCE CO., an Indiana
Corporation
Plaintiff,
v.
GARY SPOON d/b/a SPOON’S
WRECKER SERVICE
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-09-485-JHP
JUDGMENT
This action was commenced by Plaintiff, Indiana Lumbermen’s Mutual Insurance Company
(“ILM”) on 17th of December, 2009 for recovery against the Defendant, Gary Spoon d/b/a Spoon’s
Wrecker Service (“Spoon”), seeking recovery for conversion of property by Spoon of a 2008 Ford
F-350 King Ranch pick-up truck. The nature of the claim is for damages for conversion of property
and is supported by the facts of the case. Pursuant to an agreement the parties agree to enter this
judgment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff, Indiana
Lumbermen’s Mutual Insurance Co., an Indiana Corporation, have and recover judgment from and
against the Defendant, Gary Spoon for the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), plus post
judgment interest as provided by law. This judgment, upon filing shall be immediately subject to
all collection procedures available. By their signatures hereon the parties agree that this is a final
Judgment and shall not be subject to appeal and waive all rights to appeal.
Dated this 2nd day of September, 2011.
APPROVED:
S/Michael D. Gray____________
Michael D. Gray, OBA No. 11326
Ramsey and Gray, P.C.
700 Corporate Tower
101 North Robinson
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102
Telephone: (405) 239-2393
Facsimile: (405) 232-5135
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?