Williams v. Steward et al

Filing 67

OINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay : Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration [Docket No. 59] is DENIED, and his motion for ruling on the motion for reconsideration [Docket No. 65] is DENIED as moot. (acg, Deputy Clerk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MILTON VERAN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
NIAMYRA RIDDELL, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV 10-093-FHS-SPS

OPINION AND ORDER
On March 8, 2012, this civil rights action was dismissed as frivolous. Plaintiff
subsequently filed a motion for reconsideration of eight orders entered by the court: Docket
Nos. 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and 57. He, however, has offered absolutely no explanation
of why these orders should be reconsidered.
ACCORDINGLY, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration [Docket No. 59] is
DENIED, and his motion for ruling on the motion for reconsideration [Docket No. 65] is
DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of April, 2012.