Cable et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
97
ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: affirming and adopting 95 Report and Recommendation; granting 90 Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement Involving Minor Child, A.B.C. (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ALISHA N. CABLE, et al.,
Plaintiff,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 10-CV-435-JHP
ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On May 31, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Findings and
Recommendation in regard to a the Parties’ Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement Involving
Minor Child, A.B.C. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge found that the motion has merit, that the
settlement is fair and is in the best interest of A.B.C., the minor son of Alisha N. Cable, and found
that the motion should be approved and granted in all respects. Additionally, the Magistrate Judge
determined the allocation of the settlement money and attorney’s fees was reasonable and
appropriate. ( Dkt.#95). The Magistrate Judge further ordered counsel to pay the medical expenses
of $11,762.37 to the appropriate providers and to file a brief accounting of all funds disbursed within
one (1) week after the final disbursement is made. The parties waived filing any objections to the
Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation within the time prescribed by law. 28 U.S.C.
§636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
This Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is supported
by the record. Therefore, upon full consideration of the entire record and the issues presented herein,
the Court finds and orders that the Findings and Recommendation entered by the United States
Magistrate Judge on May 31, 2012, be AFFIRMED and ADOPTED by this Court as its Findings
and Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2012.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?