Cook v. Upton et al
Filing
34
AMENDED ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: granting 28 defendants Lewis Collins, Earl Maxwell and Terry Parks' MOTION to Dismiss, granting 30 defendants Jon Paul Bozeman and Josh Williams' MOTION to Dismiss (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
Cook v. Upton et al
Doc. 34
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA NEWTON JR COOK,
Plaintiff, vs. DARIN J. UPTON, JON P. BOZEMAN, JOSH WILLIAMS, TERRY PARKS, LEWIS COLLINS, BILL BOOKER and EARL MAXWELL, Defendants. AMENDED ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Lewis Collins, Earl Maxwell and Terry Parks FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Dkt.# 28), and Defendants' Jon P. Bozeman and Josh Williams FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Dkt.# 31) .1 In order to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true even if doubtful in fact. Bell Atlantic Corp. V. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964-65 (2007). Yet the Court need not accept as true legal conclusions from the complaint or "`naked assertion[s]' devoid of `further factual enhancement.'" Ashcroft v. Iqbal, ____ U.S. ____ , 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 557) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 557). The Court, after careful review of the pleadings, and based upon the reasons as more fully set forth in Defendants' No. CIV-10-445-JHP
1
Two defendants, Darin J. Upton and Bill Booker remain in the instant case.
Dockets.Justia.com
Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #s 28 and 31), finds that Plaintiff has failed to meet this standard and Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?