Bailey v. Social Security Administration
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay granting 29 MOTION for Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. 406b filed by Larita G. Bailey in the amount of $10,000.00. (adw, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
LARITA G. BAILEY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN1, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
Defendant.
No. CIV-11-053-FHS-SPS
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff’s counsel filed a Motion For Attorney Fees Pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. No. 29) on May 1, 2014. Judgment was
entered in favor of Plaintiff on September 24, 2012, remanding
this action to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g).
On remand, the Commissioner issued a November 26,
2013, decision finding in favor of Plaintiff with a disability
beginning
in
April
2008.
On
April
24,
2014,
the
plaintiff
received a Notice of Award letter.
Attorney fees are awardable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) when
a
social
1
security
claimant
is
awarded
disability
benefits
The Court has been informed by Defendant that on February
14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of
Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25 (d) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is automatically substituted
for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this action. Thus,
this suit will proceed with this substitution in effect. See 42
U.S.C. Sec. 405 (g) (“Any action instituted in accordance with
this subsection shall survive notwithstanding any change in the
person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security or
any vacancy in such office.”)
1
following a remand from a federal district court.
Barnhart,
450
F.3d
493,
(10th
496
Cir.
2006).
McGraw v.
In
such
circumstances, the fourteen-day period running from the date of
judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(2)(B)(i) will have expired and
claimants, through counsel, rely on Rule 60(b)(6) to seek such
fees well after the expiration of the fourteen-day period.
at 505.
award
Id.
The McGraw Court noted, however, that “[a] motion for an
of
reasonable
benefits.”
fees
time
under
of
§
406(b)(1)
the
should
Commissioner’s
be
filed
decision
within
a
awarding
Id. The Court finds it appropriate to authorize
Plaintiff’s counsel to file his § 406(b)(1) motion for attorney
fees following the receipt of the April 24, 2014, Notice of
Awards. Plaintiff filed his Motion for Attorney fees on May 1,
2014. The “decision awarding benefits” language referenced by the
McGraw Court necessarily includes not only the favorable decision
on
disability,
but
the
actual
award
of
past-due
benefits.
Plaintiff’s counsel is entitled to file his motion within a
reasonable
time
of
being
informed
of
the
past-due
benefits
amount. The court finds the Plaintiff’s Motion is timely filed.
Plaintiff’s counsel has moved the Court to approve an
attorney fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) in the amount of
$10,000.00 for counsel’s representation of Plaintiff before the
Court.
Counsel’s requested fees do not exceed either the amount
contracted for in the parties’ contingency agreement or the 25%
limitation of section 406(b).
Neither the Commissioner nor the
Plaintiff have presented any objection to Plaintiff’s counsel’s
request for fees in the amount of $10,000.00.
The Commissioner
has filed an informative response on the various points of law to
be considered, but does not challenge the reasonableness of the
2
requested fee. The Court has conducted an independent review of
the
record,
including
the
contingency-fee
contract
between
counsel and Plaintiff, and counsel’s documented time records, and
concludes
counsel’s
motion
is
timely
and
that
the
requested
attorney fee amount of $10,000.00 is reasonable under the facts
and circumstances of this case given the nature and quality of
the representation and the results achieved.
See Gisbrecht v.
Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-809 (2002); see also Wren v. Astrue,
525 F.3d 931, 937 (10th Cir. 2008)(“the 25% limitation of fees
for court representation found in § 406(b) is not itself limited
by the amount of fees awarded by the Commissioner”).
Consequently, Plaintiff’s counsel’s Motion For Attorney Fees
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. No. 27) is granted in the
amount of $10,000.00.
Pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d
575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986), Plaintiff's counsel is directed to
refund
to
Plaintiff
previously
awarded
the
under
smaller
the
(“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
amount, without any
amount
Equal
of
Access
fees
to
($6,619.00)
Justice
Act
This refund is for the full EAJA
withholding, offset, or deduction.
It is so ordered this 15th day of May, 2014.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?