Pinkston v. Social Security Administration
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay : This Court finds and orders that the Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge be SUSTAINED and adopted by this Court as this Court's Findings and Order. Accordingly, this case is REVERSED with orders to the Defendant to restore Claimants benefits, and that Claimant be awarded an amount equal to the benefits that would have been paid for the date of termination. 18 Report and Recommendation (acg, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JOSEPH P. PINKSTON,
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v.
) No. CIV-11-246-FHS-KEW
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner Social Security
)
Administration,
)
)
Defendant. )
ORDER
On July 24, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge for
this District filed Findings and Recommendations in this case.
No objection was filed so the Findings are deemed confessed.
The Findings and Recommendations suggest that the case be
REVERSED. This Court finds the Findings of the Magistrate Judge
applied the proper standards and documents numerous references to
the record which support the recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge that the Secretary's decision be REVERSED and that Defendant
be ordered to restore Claimant’s benefits, and that Claimant be
awarded an amount equal to the benefits that would have been paid
for the date of termination.
Upon consideration of the entire record and the issues
herein, this Court finds and orders that the Findings and
Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge be
SUSTAINED and adopted by this Court as this Court's Findings and
Order.
Accordingly, this case is REVERSED with orders to the
Defendant to restore Claimant’s benefits, and that Claimant be
awarded an amount equal to the benefits that would have been paid
for the date of termination.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of August, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?