Rogers v. Social Security Administration

Filing 6

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Transferring case to the Western District of Oklahoma (terminates case) (acg, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Lacey Rogers, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 13-CIV-036-RAW-KEW Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This case was filed on January 22, 2013. On January 26, 2013, the court entered a minute order directing Plaintiff to file a notice as to Plaintiff’s residency no later than February 1, 2013. On January 30, 2013, Plaintiff timely filed a Notice with the court stating that Plaintiff resides in Warr Acres, Oklahoma, which is located in the Western District of Oklahoma. See 28 U.S.C. § 116(c). Pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), an action brought against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) to obtain review of the Commissioner’s final decision must be “brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides...” Id. A court may transfer any civil action to any other district where it might have been brought. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). When venue is improper, 42 U.S.C. § 1406(a) requires the court to dismiss the case, “or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” Id. The court finds that the interest of justice is best served by a transfer, and not a dismissal, of this lawsuit. ACCORDINGLY, the court finds that the Eastern District of Oklahoma is not a proper venue for this action. The court further finds that transfer of this matter to the Western District of Oklahoma is appropriate under 42 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Court Clerk is directed to transfer this matter to the Western District of Oklahoma. Dated this 31st day of January, 2013. Dated this 31st day of January, 2013. J4h4i0 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?