Cooks v. Jones et al
Filing
11
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 9 Report and Recommendation.; adopting Report and Recommendations re 10 Report and Recommendation. Case Transferred to USDC EDOK. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 5/14/2013. (mb)[Transferred from okwd on 5/15/2013.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MA’ALUUM ABDULLAH a/k/a
TODD COOKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JUSTIN JONES, Director, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-13-97-D
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation and the
Supplemental Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne
Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C). Judge Mitchell recommends that Plaintiff’s
action be transferred to the Eastern District of Oklahoma pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
The record reflects no timely objection to the Report nor request for additional time to object.
The Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the Report. See
Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 East 30th
Street, 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). For this reason, and the reasons fully explained by
Judge Mitchell, the Court finds that a transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) is warranted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation
[Doc. No. 9] as modified by the Supplemental Rpoert and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10]. This
action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of May, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?