Hill v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Filing
169
ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White denying plaintiff's motion for prejudgment interest ( 137 Motion for Costs) (lal, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MICHAEL HILL, as Special Administrator )
of the Estate of Jimmy Hill,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., and
)
O.K. FARMS, INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. CIV-13-429-RAW
ORDER
Before the court is the motion of the plaintiff for prejudgment interest. Plaintiff
received a jury verdict in its favor against defendant J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. in this
negligence action.
“A federal court sitting in diversity applies state law regarding
prejudgment interest.” ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Chiang, 432 Fed.Appx. 770, 773
(10th Cir.2011). Here, the governing statutory provision is 12 O.S. §727.1(E), “which allows
prejudgment interest on a judgment for personal injury damages.” Brown v. USA Truck, Inc.,
2013 WL 4848837, *26 (W.D.Okla.2013).
This section also states, however, that “No prejudgment interest shall begin to accrue
until twenty-four (24) months after the suit resulting in the judgment was commenced.” The
present case was commenced by petition filed in LeFlore County, Oklahoma, on September
5, 2013. Under the plain language of the statute, the accrual of prejudgment interest cannot
begin until September 5, 2015. Inasmuch as a judgment was entered in this case on
November 4, 2014, accrual of prejudgment interest will never begin. This is an odd result,
but appears to be mandated by the statute. Defendant raised this statutory language in its
response (#149 at 8) and plaintiff has not suggested an alternate reading.
It is the order of the court that the motion of the plaintiff for prejudgment interest
(#137) is hereby denied.
ORDERED THIS 30th DAY OF APRIL, 2015.
Dated this 30th day of April, 2015.
J4h4i0
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?