Lawson v. Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : The decision of the ALJ is hereby REVERSED and this case is hereby REMANDED pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. 19 Report and Recommendation (acg, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JOHNNY RAY LAWSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CIV-14-088-RAW-KEW CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS On April 22, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the above-styled case be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The Government filed an objection on April 29, 2015, arguing that the Magistrate Judge required a greater level of articulation in the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “ALJ”) than is required under the Social Security Act and this Circuit’s case law. The Government requests the court affirm the final agency decision. Upon full consideration of the entire record and the issues herein, this court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation to reverse the ALJ’s decision and remand this action for further proceedings is well-supported. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby affirmed and adopted as this court’s Findings and Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is hereby REVERSED and this case is hereby REMANDED pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further administrative proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of June, 2015. __________________________________________ HONORABLE RONALD A. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?