Orso v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay sustaining the 17 Report and Recommendation which affirms the decision of the ALJ (dma, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT ORSO, Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 1 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV-14-408-FHS-KEW ORDER On September 10, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge for this District filed a Report and Recommendation in this case. On September 24, 2015, an objection was filed. In the objection, Plaintiff argues the RFC was not properly expressed in work related limitations. The Report and Recommendation found the decision by the defendant should be affirmed. This Court finds the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge applied the proper standards and documents numerous references to the record which support the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the 1 The Court has been informed by Defendant that on February 14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25 (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is automatically substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this action. Thus, this suit will proceed with this substitution in effect. See 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405 (g) (“Any action instituted in accordance with this subsection shall survive notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security or any vacancy in such office.”) Commissioner's decision be sustained. Upon consideration of the entire record and the issues herein, this Court finds and orders that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge be SUSTAINED and adopted by this Court as this Court's Findings and Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?