Arnold v. Social Security Administration
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees (sjr, Chambers)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
FELICIA B. ARNOLD,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
Case No. CIV-15-120-KEW
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter comes before this Court on the Motion for Attorney
Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) filed by Timothy M. White, the
attorney for Plaintiff (Docket Entry #24).
Counsel requests that
he be awarded fees for legal work pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in
the amount of $19,057.75.
Counsel was employed by Plaintiff to
appeal the adverse decision rendered by Administrative Law Judge
presiding over the request for benefits.
To that end, Counsel
entered into a contract for compensation with Plaintiff, providing
for the payment of a fee equal to 25% of any past due benefits
ultimately awarded to Plaintiff.
Such contracts are recognized as
valid under the prevailing case authority.
Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,
535 U.S. 789, 807 (2002).
Counsel filed Plaintiff’s opening brief and reply.
was successful in this appeal.
attorney’s
Plaintiff
As a result, Plaintiff was awarded
fees in accordance with the Equal Access to Justice Act
(“EAJA”) for the efforts before this Court in the amount of
$8,227.00.
On remand, the ALJ entered a fully favorable decision
and awarded past due benefits of $76,231.00.
The amount awarded to counsel for successfully prosecuting an
appeal of a denial of Social Security benefits and obtaining
benefits for a claimant may not exceed 25% of past due benefits.
42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A).
As in this case, Defendant is authorized
to withhold up to 25% of the past due benefits awarded to a claimant
for payment directly to the claimant’s attorney.
406(a)(4).
42 U.S.C. §
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the
25% amount is separate and apart from the amount awarded at the
agency level under 42 U.S.C. § 406(a).
931, 937-938 (10th Cir. 2008).
Wrenn v. Astrue, 525 F.3d
The only condition upon the full
award of 25% is a requirement that the court review contingency fee
arrangements “to assure that they yield reasonable results in
particular cases.”
Id. at 938 (citations omitted).
Counsel’s
requested fees do not exceed either the amount contracted for in the
contingency fee agreement or the limitations of §406(b).
Defendant generally does not take a position on awarding the
amount requested, but does state that she has no objection to the
award in this case.
Despite the fact the source for Counsel’s
compensation is a contingency fee contract, this Court has reviewed
the
contemporaneous
time
and
expense
records
based
upon
the
admonishment of the Tenth Circuit to do so and finds the time
expended to be reasonable and necessary in consideration of the
result obtained.
This Court has evaluated Counsel’s request for its timeliness.
In seeking an award under § 406(b), an attorney is required to
employ the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6).
Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 505 (10th Cir. 2006).
McGraw v.
While relief under
this rule is considered extraordinary and reserved for exceptional
circumstances, substantial justice is served by permitting its use
2
in the circumstance faced by counsel in seeking these fees.
Id.
To that end, any fee request pursued under §406(b) should be filed
“within a reasonable time of the Commissioner’s decision awarding
benefits.”
Id. (citation omitted).
In this case, Notice of Award was issued by Defendant on March
3, 2018 with a receive stamp on the document of March 5, 2018.
Counsel filed the subject Motion on April 20, 2018.
Counsel has
been admonished in the past to file § 406(b) Motions within thirty
(30) days of receiving the Notice of Award.
He did not do so in
this case and did not file a Rule 60(b) Motion.
On this occasion,
this Court will not impose the draconian result of denying fees on
the basis of untimeliness. However, counsel shall be mindful of the
requirements for timely filing in the future.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED the Motion for Attorney Fees Under 42
U.S.C. § 406(b) filed by Timothy M. White, the attorney for
Plaintiff (Docket Entry #24) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff’s counsel
is awarded fees in the amount of $19,057.75.
Defendant is directed
to pay this fee directly to counsel from the amount of past due
benefits withheld for that purpose.
In addition, Plaintiff’s
counsel shall refund the smaller amount between any EAJA fees
already awarded and the § 406(b) fees awarded in this decision to
Plaintiff.
Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2018.
______________________________
KIMBERLY E. WEST
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?