Burris v. Allbaugh et al
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Dismissing case without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1406(a). (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
CASEY C. BURRIS,
JOE ALLBAUGH, et al.,
No. CIV 16-370-RAW-SPS
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections (DOC) who is
incarcerated at Cimarron Correctional Facility, a private prison in Cushing, Oklahoma, has filed this
civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants are DOC Director Joe Allbaugh,
Oklahoma State Reformatory Warden Tracy McCollum, and former Joseph Harp Correctional Center
Warden Mike Addison. Plaintiff alleges he has illegally been transferred to private prisons, and his
life has been put in jeopardy at his current facility. He is requesting monetary damages and his
To the extent Plaintiff asks for equitable relief in the form of release from confinement, a §
1983 cause of action is not the appropriate means for seeking such relief. Rather, habeas corpus is the
exclusive remedy for a state prisoner challenging the fact or duration of his confinement when the
relief sought includes immediate or speedier release. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489-90
(1973). Furthermore, it is well settled that there is no constitutional right to incarceration in a
particular correctional facility. Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 245 (1983).
A review of the complaint indicates all the defendants appear to be located within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Because proper
venue does not lie in this district, see 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of October 2016.
Dated this 18th day of October, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?