Cantrell v. Johnson et al

Filing 86

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion to Compel. The Defendant is directed to provide all responsive documents within fourteen (14) days, and the Plaintiff likewise has fourteen (14) days in which to issue more specific requests for admission on the issues raised before the undersigned Magistrate Judge. (ndd, Deputy Clerk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DONNA CANTRELL, as Next Friend of )
GARY LYONS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MISTY JOHNSON, in her individual
)
capacity, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No. CIV-16-400-JHP

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL
Regarding the Plaintiff Donna Cantrell’s Motion to Compel [Docket No. 77],
which has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for final disposition
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the undersigned Magistrate Judge orders the
following:
1.
As to Request for Admission No. 3, the Defendant’s objection is
sustained and the Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
2.
As to Requests for Admission Nos. 6 and 7, the Defendant’s
objection is sustained, but the Plaintiff may issue more specifically-tailored
requests for admission on these issues.
3.
As to Document Request No. 8, the Defendant’s objection is
sustained, but the Defendant is directed to provide Plaintiff a privilege log of
communication that has not been produced to the Plaintiff.
4.
As to Document Request No. 10, the Defendant’s objection is
sustained and Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
5.

As to Document Request No. 11, the Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

6.

As to Document Request No. 14, the Plaintiff’s Motion is MOOT.

7.
With regard to the Defendant Johnson’s refusal to perform the armbar technique at her deposition, the Defendant’s objection to performing it is
sustained, subject to the proviso that Defendant Johnson is likewise precluded
from demonstrating such a technique at trial.
The Defendant is directed to provide all responsive documents within fourteen
(14) days, and the Plaintiff likewise has fourteen (14) days in which to issue more
specific requests for admission on the issues raised before the undersigned Magistrate
Judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2017.

-2-