Willis v. Social Security Administration
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER Awarding Attorney's Fees to the Plaintiff Under the EAJA by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting in part 24 Motion for Attorney Fees by Daniel H. Willis. (tls, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DANIEL H. WILLIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER of the Social
Security Administration,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-16-437-SPS
OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING
ATTORNEY’S FEES TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE EAJA
Plaintiff Daniel H. Willis was the prevailing party in this action under the Social
Security Act. Plaintiff originally sought an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of
$7,653.60, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Docket
No. 24. The Commissioner response indicated that the parties have agreed to a stipulated
award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,831.50, a reduction of $822.10 from the
original fee request. See Docket No. 25.
Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that the agreed amount is
reasonable and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to the Plaintiff as the
prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“Except as otherwise specifically
provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States
fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a),
incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]”); see also
Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) (“The EAJA therefore permits
attorney’s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper
application, and not to their attorneys.”).
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees
Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 24] is hereby GRANTED IN
PART, to the extent that the Government is ordered to pay the agreed-upon $6,831.50 fee
award to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if
the Plaintiff’s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1),
said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Plaintiff pursuant to
Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).
DATED this 29th day of June, 2018.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?