Stevens et al v. Animal Control Officer et al
ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White granting defendants' motion to dismiss ( 94 Motion to Dismiss ) and dismissing as party defendants Nik Morgan and Morgan and Son's Towing Service (lal, Deputy Clerk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case No. CIV-16-531-RAW
MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA ANIMAL
CONTROL, et al.,
Before the court is the motion of defendants Nik Morgan and Morgan and Sons
Towing Service to dismiss. Plaintiff, appearing pro se, alleges multiple claims pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §1983 against multiple defendants. Plaintiff was convicted in Texas state court
for possession of child pornography, and those convictions were recently affirmed. Stevens
v. State, 2017 WL 411382 (Tex.App. - Tyler 2017). Initially, plaintiff was arrested for
cruelty to animals, and six horses that were determined to be in poor condition were moved
“to another location for treatment.” Id. at *1.
Evidently, on or about December 10, 2013, movants picked up and removed horses
belonging to plaintiff, although not the horses involved in the Texas criminal conduct.
Rather, they were roaming horses in the Muskogee, Oklahoma area. Movants assert any
claim against them is barred by the statute of limitations and by the fact that they are not
“state actors” under §1983. (The complaint names both defendants in their individual and
offical capacity, but that distinction does not apply to a private party in any event). As it has
done in connection with other motions in this case, the court finds the claim is barred by the
statute of limitations.
It is the order of the court that the motion to dismiss (#94) is hereby granted. Nik
Morgan and Morgan and Son’s Towing Service are dismissed as party defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of AUGUST, 2017.
RONALD A. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?