Ennis v. Well Renewal, Inc. et al

Filing 70

OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; granting 56 Motion for Writ of Execution; accepting 65 Report and Recommendation (Re: 34 Judgment,, Entering Judgment ) (RGG, Chambers)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JERRY D. ENNIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WELL RENEWAL, INC., an Oklahoma ) Suspended corporation and WELL ) RENEWAL, INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 07-CV-0436-CVE-PJC OPINION AND ORDER In his Motion to Issue Writ of Execution to Sell the Gulley Oil and Gas Lease (Dkt. # 56), plaintiff seeks issuance of a writ of execution on the Gulley Oil and Gas Lease, which encompasses the North Half of the Southeast Quarter (N/2 SE/4) and the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE/4 SE/4 SE/4) of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 17 East, Rogers County, State of Oklahoma. United States Magistrate Judge T. Lane Wilson entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 65) on said motion. In his Report and Recommendation, the magistrate judge recommended that plaintiff's motion be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on January 26, 2009, and no party has filed an objection. The Court has independently reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and finds no reason to modify or reject it. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 65) is accepted. Plaintiff's Motion to Issue Writ (Dkt. # 56) is granted, and the Court Clerk is directed to issue a Writ of Execution directing the U.S. Marshal to take possession of the above described property, cause said property to be sold by public sale on the steps of the Rogers County Courthouse, and apply the sale proceeds toward the satisfaction of plaintiff's judgment. DATED this 13th day of February, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?