Kinkead v. Durborow et al
Filing
138
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy (MLC, Chambers)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARK KINKEAD, PLAINTIFF, vs. TERRY DURBOROW, et al., DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 08-CV-562-JHP-FHM
OPINION AND ORDER Correspondence from Plaintiff, Mark Kinkead, to the Clerk of Court titled: Judicial Notification [Dkt. 137] is before the Court for consideration. Liberally construed, the Court understands the correspondence to be a motion for a protective order to prevent Defendants from conducting discovery in the form of Defendants' Subpoena Duces-Tecum dated October 1, 2010. [Dkt. 136-1]. In its prior Opinion and Order issued September 29, 2010 [Dkt. 135], the Court explained that it did not intend for general merits discovery to occur prior to a ruling on dispositive motions. The Court, therefore, grants a protective order directing Defendants to withdraw the Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by Defendants on September 29, 2010 [Dkt. 136-1] and stays further discovery in the case until the Court rules on dispositive motions. SO ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2010.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
