Woodul v. Ozment

Filing 24

OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 21 Motion for Sanctions (tjc, Dpty Clk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DANIEL WOODUL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALDEN OZMENT,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 13-CV-163-JED-FHM

OPINION AND ORDER
Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions [Dkt. No. 21] is before the court for decision.
Plaintiff has filed a response [Dkt. No. 23]. No reply has been filed.
Defendant’s motion seeks sanctions for Plaintiff’s alleged failure to comply with the
court’s order granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 16]. After the Motion to
Compel was granted this case was dismissed. Plaintiff subsequently filed a state court
case and agreed to produce the information ordered produced by this court in the state
case. Based upon these facts this court finds that sanctions are not warranted.
Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions [Dkt. No. 21] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2013.